<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advice for Home Owners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/</link>
	<description>An honest attempt at impartial investigative reporting by Grenville Phillips II</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:40:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-716</guid>
		<description>Wow talk about poor quality and lack of inspections. These guys need to be held to some codes.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi Mike:

The difficult obstacle appears to be the will to do, rather than any knowledge deficiencies.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow talk about poor quality and lack of inspections. These guys need to be held to some codes.</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi Mike:</p>
<p>The difficult obstacle appears to be the will to do, rather than any knowledge deficiencies.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexwebmaster</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexwebmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-640</guid>
		<description>Hello webmaster 
I would like to share with you a link to your site 
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello webmaster<br />
I would like to share with you a link to your site<br />
write me here <a href="mailto:preonrelt@mail.ru">preonrelt@mail.ru</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Worst House that the Code Will Allow &#171; Weighed in the Balance</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>The Worst House that the Code Will Allow &#171; Weighed in the Balance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-632</guid>
		<description>[...] Advice for Homeowners [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Advice for Homeowners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-630</guid>
		<description>What is your opinion of using ESP (Extruded Foam Panels) as a building option in Bds?


&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi Ray:

ESP is not normally a structural (load bearing) material.  It can be used as insulation sandwiched between structural materials. 

However, given the improvements in building materials, if a manufacturer has been able to develop a structural foam panel, then you should request the technical specifications, and ensure that it comes with a verifiable warrantee if you wish to use it.

If you know of such a manufacturer, then you are welcome to post its web-site here so that it can be Weighed in the Balance.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your opinion of using ESP (Extruded Foam Panels) as a building option in Bds?</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi Ray:</p>
<p>ESP is not normally a structural (load bearing) material.  It can be used as insulation sandwiched between structural materials. </p>
<p>However, given the improvements in building materials, if a manufacturer has been able to develop a structural foam panel, then you should request the technical specifications, and ensure that it comes with a verifiable warrantee if you wish to use it.</p>
<p>If you know of such a manufacturer, then you are welcome to post its web-site here so that it can be Weighed in the Balance.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wstraughn</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Wstraughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Hi Grenville,  my house was built 2006-2007 and unfortunately I&#039;m pretty sure from reading your posts that it is not in the best shape to withstand any IVAN like strike...   Short of demolishing it and starting over, or running to a shelter in defeat every time I hear a hurricane is threatening,  what would you  recommend a home owner in my position do improve a house&#039;s chances of surviving a hurricane?  From what I can see I have : 1) Not enough sheer walls,  2)  Roof rafters spaced at 770mm!!!!! Can these issues  be mitigated after the house is completed without  having to rob a bank?! (Note:  It wasn&#039;t me who was up at the  6X roads RBTT recently ... I was working!)

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi Wstraughn:

The Barbados National Building Code (BNBC) allows rafters to be spaced up to 1.2 m, however, you should use the timber type, size, and span as specified in Table 2.803.9.  However, if it were my house, I would not space the more than 600 mm apart.

Let me state that I am not giving you any advice here whatsoever, since I have neither seen the plans of your house, nor received information on your loading requirements. My advice to you would be to exceed the minimum building standards in the Building Code and to seek the advice of a Registered Engineer.

1.  Roof

The first thing that I would do is to determine whether my roof is actually substandard.  If I have a 2.4 m (8 ft) long 2”x6” Purpleheart rafter, then my 770 mm spacing exceeds the minimum requirements of the BNBC.  However, a similar rafter out of Pine is less than what the BNBC requires.

I would install stainless steel hurricane connectors at all timber connections, and ensure that I used stainless steel screws or nails.  I would also install rafter bracing (collar tie) and additional roof covering connections as shown in the BNBC Figure 2.805.  

2.  Shear Walls

If my walls are timber stud walls, then I would install a timber brace as shown in Figure 2.804.2.  If they are concrete block, then I would fix a 50 mm x 50 mm galvanised weldmesh (BRC Ref.5050 25) to the external face of the widest panels that I had, and apply a 12 mm minimum (1 cement:3 sand) mortar plaster.  See BNBC Figure 2.405A for a description of the wall panels.

3.  Windows and Doors

I would secure my windows and doors.  United Insurance has a booklet which describes some effective retrofitting measures and which can be downloaded from here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unitedinsure.com/united.cfm?LID=helpful%20info&amp;SID=Hurricane%20Retrofitting&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.unitedinsure.com/united.cfm?LID=helpful%20info&amp;SID=Hurricane%20Retrofitting&lt;/a&gt;

I would also get adequate insurance.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Grenville,  my house was built 2006-2007 and unfortunately I&#8217;m pretty sure from reading your posts that it is not in the best shape to withstand any IVAN like strike&#8230;   Short of demolishing it and starting over, or running to a shelter in defeat every time I hear a hurricane is threatening,  what would you  recommend a home owner in my position do improve a house&#8217;s chances of surviving a hurricane?  From what I can see I have : 1) Not enough sheer walls,  2)  Roof rafters spaced at 770mm!!!!! Can these issues  be mitigated after the house is completed without  having to rob a bank?! (Note:  It wasn&#8217;t me who was up at the  6X roads RBTT recently &#8230; I was working!)</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi Wstraughn:</p>
<p>The Barbados National Building Code (BNBC) allows rafters to be spaced up to 1.2 m, however, you should use the timber type, size, and span as specified in Table 2.803.9.  However, if it were my house, I would not space the more than 600 mm apart.</p>
<p>Let me state that I am not giving you any advice here whatsoever, since I have neither seen the plans of your house, nor received information on your loading requirements. My advice to you would be to exceed the minimum building standards in the Building Code and to seek the advice of a Registered Engineer.</p>
<p>1.  Roof</p>
<p>The first thing that I would do is to determine whether my roof is actually substandard.  If I have a 2.4 m (8 ft) long 2”x6” Purpleheart rafter, then my 770 mm spacing exceeds the minimum requirements of the BNBC.  However, a similar rafter out of Pine is less than what the BNBC requires.</p>
<p>I would install stainless steel hurricane connectors at all timber connections, and ensure that I used stainless steel screws or nails.  I would also install rafter bracing (collar tie) and additional roof covering connections as shown in the BNBC Figure 2.805.  </p>
<p>2.  Shear Walls</p>
<p>If my walls are timber stud walls, then I would install a timber brace as shown in Figure 2.804.2.  If they are concrete block, then I would fix a 50 mm x 50 mm galvanised weldmesh (BRC Ref.5050 25) to the external face of the widest panels that I had, and apply a 12 mm minimum (1 cement:3 sand) mortar plaster.  See BNBC Figure 2.405A for a description of the wall panels.</p>
<p>3.  Windows and Doors</p>
<p>I would secure my windows and doors.  United Insurance has a booklet which describes some effective retrofitting measures and which can be downloaded from here:<br />
<a href="http://www.unitedinsure.com/united.cfm?LID=helpful%20info&amp;SID=Hurricane%20Retrofitting" rel="nofollow">http://www.unitedinsure.com/united.cfm?LID=helpful%20info&amp;SID=Hurricane%20Retrofitting</a></p>
<p>I would also get adequate insurance.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.S.P</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>A.S.P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-593</guid>
		<description>In many houses that are built in Barbados, the area for the footings is excavated and after the foundation walls are built the marl is placed on the mud. Is this practice accceptable or are you supposed to excavaate the entire area to rock?
thanks

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi ASP:

The Barbados National Building Code, Section 2.507 provides the procedure for concrete slabs on ground floors.  You should remove the &quot;top-soil and any organic material&quot; (BNBC 2.507.2 (a)).

Mud (topsoil and organic material) will compress.  If you leave it in, then you can use it as formwork to support your slab, which you should design as a suspended slab.  BNBC Section 2.603 gives the minimum thickness and reinforcement requirements for suspended slabs.

If you wish the underlying material to permanently support the ground floor slab, then you must remove the topsoil and organic material and replace it with granular (e.g. marl) fill.

Best regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In many houses that are built in Barbados, the area for the footings is excavated and after the foundation walls are built the marl is placed on the mud. Is this practice accceptable or are you supposed to excavaate the entire area to rock?<br />
thanks</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi ASP:</p>
<p>The Barbados National Building Code, Section 2.507 provides the procedure for concrete slabs on ground floors.  You should remove the &#8220;top-soil and any organic material&#8221; (BNBC 2.507.2 (a)).</p>
<p>Mud (topsoil and organic material) will compress.  If you leave it in, then you can use it as formwork to support your slab, which you should design as a suspended slab.  BNBC Section 2.603 gives the minimum thickness and reinforcement requirements for suspended slabs.</p>
<p>If you wish the underlying material to permanently support the ground floor slab, then you must remove the topsoil and organic material and replace it with granular (e.g. marl) fill.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smoove</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>smoove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-586</guid>
		<description>Hi Grenvill, I am preparing to build a single story wall home. The code recommends 16&quot; wide and 8&quot; deep minimum footings. Contractor suggests 24&quot; wide and 10 &quot; deep footings. Is this an overkill/ waste of money? or should I go with the contractor.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi Smoove:

The Code (section 2.506.1) actually recommends a minimum strip footing size of 12&quot; wide x 8&quot; thick (300 mm x 200 mm) assuming a good bearing material.  The 16&quot; wide x 10&quot; thick (400 mm x 250 mm) is for a two storey building.  You may wish to consider the two storey foundation size since you or your estate may wish to add another storey at a later date.

The 24&quot; (600 mm) wide footing exceeds the minimum for rock.  If your footings are not bearing on hard limestone, then it may be prudent to use the 24&quot; wide footing to manage the risk.  In my opinion, it is not a waste of money.  Perhaps a 36&quot; (900 mm) wide footing for a single storey house on hard limestone could be a waste of money.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Grenvill, I am preparing to build a single story wall home. The code recommends 16&#8243; wide and 8&#8243; deep minimum footings. Contractor suggests 24&#8243; wide and 10 &#8221; deep footings. Is this an overkill/ waste of money? or should I go with the contractor.</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi Smoove:</p>
<p>The Code (section 2.506.1) actually recommends a minimum strip footing size of 12&#8243; wide x 8&#8243; thick (300 mm x 200 mm) assuming a good bearing material.  The 16&#8243; wide x 10&#8243; thick (400 mm x 250 mm) is for a two storey building.  You may wish to consider the two storey foundation size since you or your estate may wish to add another storey at a later date.</p>
<p>The 24&#8243; (600 mm) wide footing exceeds the minimum for rock.  If your footings are not bearing on hard limestone, then it may be prudent to use the 24&#8243; wide footing to manage the risk.  In my opinion, it is not a waste of money.  Perhaps a 36&#8243; (900 mm) wide footing for a single storey house on hard limestone could be a waste of money.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smoove</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>smoove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-585</guid>
		<description>I see you say that it is a violation to fill on the rock and then put the footings on it. Is this still aproblem if the fill is compacted in a satisfactory manner in small lifts. The reason I ask this, is because I read somewhere that when placing the footing on Rock you have to be careful of the jagged edges of the rock as these creste pressure points on the footings resulting in &quot;fractures&quot; or breakages in the footing itself after a period of time. Please do shed some light on this.
Thanks

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi Smoove:

The Barbados National Building Code (BNBC) states: &quot;Excavations for footings shall be taken down to the depths necessary to provide solid support of the loads superimposed by the building.  FOOTINGS SHALL NOT BEAR ON FILL MATERIAL.&quot; BNBC 2.504.4 (Emphasis mine)

Therefore excavate until you find the necessary solid support.  If you do not find it, then you need some professional advice depending on the type of soil that you have (sand, clay, etc)

Regarding jagged edges of rock.  It is good practise to cut into the rock 50 mm to 75 mm to remove the weathered portion, provide a relatively flat bearing area, and provide a key to the footing.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you say that it is a violation to fill on the rock and then put the footings on it. Is this still aproblem if the fill is compacted in a satisfactory manner in small lifts. The reason I ask this, is because I read somewhere that when placing the footing on Rock you have to be careful of the jagged edges of the rock as these creste pressure points on the footings resulting in &#8220;fractures&#8221; or breakages in the footing itself after a period of time. Please do shed some light on this.<br />
Thanks</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi Smoove:</p>
<p>The Barbados National Building Code (BNBC) states: &#8220;Excavations for footings shall be taken down to the depths necessary to provide solid support of the loads superimposed by the building.  FOOTINGS SHALL NOT BEAR ON FILL MATERIAL.&#8221; BNBC 2.504.4 (Emphasis mine)</p>
<p>Therefore excavate until you find the necessary solid support.  If you do not find it, then you need some professional advice depending on the type of soil that you have (sand, clay, etc)</p>
<p>Regarding jagged edges of rock.  It is good practise to cut into the rock 50 mm to 75 mm to remove the weathered portion, provide a relatively flat bearing area, and provide a key to the footing.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Harding</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>John Harding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Dear Grenville I have read your article with interest. I am a bajan returnee and have purchased land in Barbados and eager to get started on plans etc. Can you give me any information on how many dollars per square foot it would cost for a three bedroom 2 bathroom house. My land is at St Peters Haywood Estate. Also can you recommend any good builders?
Regards John

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi John:

For budgetary reasons, you should estimate $250 per square foot of floor area.  I regret to report that I cannot in all good conscience recommend any good builders.  You will see why in today&#039;s article.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Grenville I have read your article with interest. I am a bajan returnee and have purchased land in Barbados and eager to get started on plans etc. Can you give me any information on how many dollars per square foot it would cost for a three bedroom 2 bathroom house. My land is at St Peters Haywood Estate. Also can you recommend any good builders?<br />
Regards John</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi John:</p>
<p>For budgetary reasons, you should estimate $250 per square foot of floor area.  I regret to report that I cannot in all good conscience recommend any good builders.  You will see why in today&#8217;s article.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novice</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>novice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-574</guid>
		<description>thanks grenville. the foundations are shallow.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ok.  You know what to do.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks grenville. the foundations are shallow.</p>
<p><em><strong>Ok.  You know what to do.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novice</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>novice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-571</guid>
		<description>I have just started to build and my contractor is saying that I should have 1/2&quot; steel in every block hole for the foundation wall and that each hole should be poured with concrete. Is this necessary or is it an overkill?

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi Novice:

Of course I must give you the standard preamble as given to Tony W in the post before yours, since I have not seen the site.

The amount of vertical reinforcement that your builder is using is normal if the wall is to retain something. Perhaps it is to retaining water from an underground water tank, or external soil because the foundations are deep. 

If the foundations are shallow, and there is no soil or water to retain, then if it were my house, I would use 12 mm (1/2″) diameter high yield bars at 600 mm (2′) centres for all of the walls, not just the foundation. It is also important to fill all block cavities below the ground floor slab with grout, even the ones without any reinforcement.

The BNBC calls for a minimum of 10 mm diameter mild steel reinforcing bars at 800 mm centres. (BNBC 2.405.2 (c))

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just started to build and my contractor is saying that I should have 1/2&#8243; steel in every block hole for the foundation wall and that each hole should be poured with concrete. Is this necessary or is it an overkill?</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi Novice:</p>
<p>Of course I must give you the standard preamble as given to Tony W in the post before yours, since I have not seen the site.</p>
<p>The amount of vertical reinforcement that your builder is using is normal if the wall is to retain something. Perhaps it is to retaining water from an underground water tank, or external soil because the foundations are deep. </p>
<p>If the foundations are shallow, and there is no soil or water to retain, then if it were my house, I would use 12 mm (1/2″) diameter high yield bars at 600 mm (2′) centres for all of the walls, not just the foundation. It is also important to fill all block cavities below the ground floor slab with grout, even the ones without any reinforcement.</p>
<p>The BNBC calls for a minimum of 10 mm diameter mild steel reinforcing bars at 800 mm centres. (BNBC 2.405.2 (c))</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony W.</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Are the pad footings supposed to be connected by beams??

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi Tony:

The BNBC 2.506.2 specifies minimum pier or column pad footing sizes and notes that such footings should be continuous.

It is good practise to tie the pad footings to other footings using tie beams.  If it were my house, &lt;/strong&gt;and I must once again interrupt myself here so that you may clearly understand that I am not giving you any advice here whatsoever, since I have neither seen the plans of your house, nor received information on your loading requirements. My advice to you would be to exceed the minimum building standards in the Building Code and to seek the advice of a Registered Engineer. That said, &lt;strong&gt;I would use 200 mm deep x 300 mm wide concrete beams reinforced with minimum 4 x 12 mm diameter high yield bars with 8 mm diameter links spaced 200 mm apart.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the pad footings supposed to be connected by beams??</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi Tony:</p>
<p>The BNBC 2.506.2 specifies minimum pier or column pad footing sizes and notes that such footings should be continuous.</p>
<p>It is good practise to tie the pad footings to other footings using tie beams.  If it were my house, </strong>and I must once again interrupt myself here so that you may clearly understand that I am not giving you any advice here whatsoever, since I have neither seen the plans of your house, nor received information on your loading requirements. My advice to you would be to exceed the minimum building standards in the Building Code and to seek the advice of a Registered Engineer. That said, <strong>I would use 200 mm deep x 300 mm wide concrete beams reinforced with minimum 4 x 12 mm diameter high yield bars with 8 mm diameter links spaced 200 mm apart.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony W.</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Pier footings or strip fottings? Is there any advantage of using one over the other? Which one is more cost effective?
Aren&#039;t the pier footings supposed to be connected by a strip footing??

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi Tony:

Pier footings or pad footings are normally used to economically support columns.  Strip footings are normally used to economically support walls.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pier footings or strip fottings? Is there any advantage of using one over the other? Which one is more cost effective?<br />
Aren&#8217;t the pier footings supposed to be connected by a strip footing??</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi Tony:</p>
<p>Pier footings or pad footings are normally used to economically support columns.  Strip footings are normally used to economically support walls.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-561</guid>
		<description>I know roofs are very technical and therefore costs run rather high.What is the average cost per sq.ft using corrugated sheet and close boarding (t-111) and is this cheaper compared to a Ceiling using Gypsum board.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi Jackson:

You can probably have the roof framing and close boarding installed for around $25/sq ft.  The Gypsum Wall Board is cheaper than the T-111, however, if it gets wet, it can facilitate mould growth.  Please be advised that during a hurricane, if the building envelope is breached, just about everything inside gets wet.  Principally for that reason, I would not use the gypsum material.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know roofs are very technical and therefore costs run rather high.What is the average cost per sq.ft using corrugated sheet and close boarding (t-111) and is this cheaper compared to a Ceiling using Gypsum board.</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi Jackson:</p>
<p>You can probably have the roof framing and close boarding installed for around $25/sq ft.  The Gypsum Wall Board is cheaper than the T-111, however, if it gets wet, it can facilitate mould growth.  Please be advised that during a hurricane, if the building envelope is breached, just about everything inside gets wet.  Principally for that reason, I would not use the gypsum material.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony W.</title>
		<link>http://researching.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/advice-for-home-owners/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://researching.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-557</guid>
		<description>Okay thanks. 
Some people suggest using half inch steel instead of the wire mesh? What are your views on this.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hi Tony:

The minimum building standards in the Code are just that - minimum building standards.

If it were my house, &lt;/strong&gt;and I must interrupt myself here so that you may clearly understand that I am not giving you any advice here whatsoever, since I have neither seen the plans of your house, nor received information on your loading requirements.  My advice to you would be to exceed the minimum building standards in the Building Code and to seek the advice of a Registered Engineer.  That said, &lt;strong&gt;I would assume that my wife and I may be entertaining a lot of people on our patio.  Therefore for a 3.6 m (12&#039;) span, I would use a 150 mm (6&quot;) thick slab, and 12 mm (1/2&quot;) diameter high yield (also called high tension) reinforcement to the British Standard BS4449.  The 12 mm bars would continuously span the supports and be spaced at 150 mm (6&quot;).

I would use this slab thickness and reinforcement wherever I expect heavier loads, like my library.  Where I expect lighter loads, like a bedroom or bathroom, I would keep the 150 mm thick slab but increase the spacing of the reinforcement to 200 mm (8&quot;).

If I were uncertain about the future use of a space or room, then I would assume patio loading throughout.

Regards,
Grenville&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay thanks.<br />
Some people suggest using half inch steel instead of the wire mesh? What are your views on this.</p>
<p><em><strong>Hi Tony:</p>
<p>The minimum building standards in the Code are just that &#8211; minimum building standards.</p>
<p>If it were my house, </strong>and I must interrupt myself here so that you may clearly understand that I am not giving you any advice here whatsoever, since I have neither seen the plans of your house, nor received information on your loading requirements.  My advice to you would be to exceed the minimum building standards in the Building Code and to seek the advice of a Registered Engineer.  That said, <strong>I would assume that my wife and I may be entertaining a lot of people on our patio.  Therefore for a 3.6 m (12&#8242;) span, I would use a 150 mm (6&#8243;) thick slab, and 12 mm (1/2&#8243;) diameter high yield (also called high tension) reinforcement to the British Standard BS4449.  The 12 mm bars would continuously span the supports and be spaced at 150 mm (6&#8243;).</p>
<p>I would use this slab thickness and reinforcement wherever I expect heavier loads, like my library.  Where I expect lighter loads, like a bedroom or bathroom, I would keep the 150 mm thick slab but increase the spacing of the reinforcement to 200 mm (8&#8243;).</p>
<p>If I were uncertain about the future use of a space or room, then I would assume patio loading throughout.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Grenville</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
